The Rise of Memory-Driven Agents: MCP, A2A, and the Future of AI Context

Over the past year, we've witnessed a pivotal shift in how large language models (LLMs) operate—not just as static assistants, but as adaptive, memory-driven agents capable of interacting with real-world systems. One of the most promising developments in this direction is Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). But they’re not alone. Google’s A2A protocol, Gemini, OpenAI's custom GPT memory, and GitHub Copilot are all moving toward richer, context-aware interfaces.

In this post, we’ll explore:

• What MCP, A2A, and similar context protocols are—and why they matter
• How each major platform is approaching this shift
• The risks of making AI agents truly “aware”
• What boundaries and protections we must consider as this future unfolds

What Does It Really Mean to Bring Memory to AI?

“Memory” isn’t just about chat histories or storing user preferences—it’s a shift from isolated LLMs to embedded agents operating with live, structured context.

Historically, models worked like stateless functions: you gave them a prompt, and they gave a response. No persistent memory, no awareness of your system, no access to tools. That’s now changing fast. Modern models are being hooked into the real world: file systems, shell environments, browser tabs, APIs, HTTP requests, even dev environments. The result? Agents that can observe, react to, and influence their environments with increasing precision.

That’s powerful—but also potentially dangerous.

Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP)

MCP is a specification for exposing real-world context—like files, shell output, or user activity—to LLMs via standardized JSON endpoints. Instead of stuffing environment data into prompts, tools can expose it automatically in a structured format.

Why MCP matters

MCP opens the door to integrations like:

• Reading Gmail messages through an MCP Gmail server
• Inspecting open files and git diffs in your IDE
• Querying local SQLite databases or interacting with Docker containers

The architecture includes:

• Client: the LLM app (e.g., Copilot) making requests and showing responses
• Server: middleware that exposes local or remote context (e.g., file system, API, DB)
• Host: the environment tying it all together (user system, dev environment, etc.)

These components allow agents to interface with their world—securely and systematically—without relying on prompt hacks.

Google’s Agent-to-Agent Protocol (A2A)

Where MCP focuses on local context and tool access, A2A is about agent-to-agent communication.

Google introduced A2A as an open standard for secure, structured communication between agents via HTTPS and JSON. It enables:

• Cross-agent collaboration without needing internal implementation details
• Authenticated, signed requests with permission control
• Memory and user goals passed between agents

This makes it possible to delegate tasks—like booking a meeting or fetching data—across agents securely and modularly.

Gemini’s Contextual Features

Google’s Gemini ecosystem is already hinting at MCP/A2A-like behavior:

• Workspace integration: Gemini can access Gmail, Docs, Calendar—providing it with up-to-date, real-world context
• Extensions: Support for third-party services like YouTube or Google Flights
• Android App Actions: Structured interactions with app functions, mimicking function-calling APIs

Together, these features form a powerful substrate for Gemini to operate as a live contextual agent.

OpenAI’s Emerging Context Capabilities

While OpenAI hasn’t released an MCP-equivalent protocol, they’re building similar functionality through:

• Custom GPTs with Memory: Can persist facts about the user, goals, style, preferences across sessions
• ChatGPT Memory (Pro): Remembers user settings and preferences
• Function Calling + RAG: Combines API calls, retrieval from external knowledge, and memory in one seamless agent loop

These capabilities hint at a future where OpenAI agents can persist state, perform actions, and remember users intelligently—a partial realization of MCP/A2A-style designs.

GitHub Copilot: Early Adopter of Context-Aware Code Agents

GitHub was one of the earliest platforms to support MCP-style interactions. Already, you can find MCP servers built for GitHub workflows. But even beyond that, Copilot demonstrates several memory-driven behaviors:

• Local Context Awareness: Suggests based on open files, file trees, and recent edits
• Project-wide Indexing: For Copilot Business and Chat, it indexes entire repos
• Copilot Workspace (Upcoming): A preview of persistent, task-driven agents that may evolve into full MCP-style contexts

The Risks: New Power, New Attack Surfaces

With great context comes great risk. When LLMs gain access to real systems, the consequences of misuse become tangible.

• Prompt injection is no longer just a joke—it can leak files, trigger shell commands, or send network requests
• Over-permissioned agents become major attack vectors if improperly scoped
• Auditability and access control are now critical—like in any distributed microservice architecture

We must treat agents like we treat backend services:

• What data can they access?
• Who can talk to them?
• Can their access be revoked or sandboxed?
• Are actions logged and monitored?

Conclusion: The Security Conversation is Just Beginning

Embedding memory and context into AI is where the most exciting use cases live. But it’s also where the biggest security and governance questions begin.

Protocols like MCP and A2A are enabling a future where agents can truly act, remember, and collaborate—but we must define the boundaries, audit trails, and fail-safes now before these systems become too entangled in our infrastructure.

We’re entering the era of context-aware agents. Let’s build them with power, but also with care.

‍